Відео

"Where Did All the Water Go After the Biblical Flood?" - came here for an answer to this question, let with no answer. Clickbaited

Answer……Merthyr Tydfil.

This is just unbelievable, very very informative Be Blessed AMEN.

😂🎉😢 it's the footballer pele you're talking about?

I think many people fail to realize that the spiritual laws can override natural laws. For example when Messiah fed the people with loaves and fish physically this is impossible for us to imagine how can you eat and yet more comes from it? this is the purpose of faith just as noah was swallowed he should not had survived yet he did this is the purpose of faith

When global warming causes the oceans to rise Ken can jump on his Boat and ride it out.

Just like people swore the earth was flat. In the Bible, it refers to the earth as a sphere. Long before it was found to be like that. Look up definition of a sphere= ball, globe, orb, circleand so on

Don't forget about the huge anchor stones found and the ballist stones found around the sight.

It's a fairy tale only if you are a fairy.

I pray I visit one day😇

Nice Fantasy movie 😂

The Truth is the biblical Flood happened only in a certain part, not Global.

Beautiful testimony. God Bless you 🕊🤍💛

the ark was inspired by God (JHWH) so what will u aspect my friends? HE knows all what human and animals needs in life.

I went there today it is so cool animatronic if Noah and so much more you would like it

I like the jacket, is it available for purchase in the gift shop?

I saw an experiment with a small scale model of the ark, and it was tested in a special tank, simulating rough seas, and it broke up and sank. The experiment was flawed, however, because it was based on the assumption that the seas would have been rough during the flood. What if they were calm? It would have been very possible that God could have flooded the Earth over the course of the 40 days and nights, and kept it under water for the 150 days that came after, and still kept the waters calm. It is pretty dumb to assume that God would save life from being destroyed in the ark, but then subject them to rough seas, that had the potential to kill them. It makes more sense to assume that he would have kept the seas calm, to protect them.

This story is mentioned in the Quran, the Bible and the Torah.

Dude. U k ow they did 3d scans of the one in turkey, right? And that they found wooden beams in it. Chinese svienalso went inside 😅 and found rooms.

There are millions of species on earth. There is no way these would fit on one boat.

Actual argument begins as 3:00. Good grief get to the point already.

😂😂 🤪😜😂😂

He's not a doctor. LOL

Doesn’t the Quran state its mount Judi? If it does - that’s where it is !

Science is real. Religion is fake

Lol an people actually believe this 😂😂😂

Some animals were not aloud on

We didn't find human remains in the geological record alongside dinosaurs because God said he would wipe out humanity completely except for Noah and his family.

I do believe that Noah built an ark. But i believe it was much bigger than this. The measurement of a cubit depends on how tall the individual measuring + building the object is..... With this being said, there is a lot of evidence to support that not only giants existed back then, but that people could have been taller generally speaking also.

To say that a fossil is a "mammal" or "mammal-like" is not to say that it is either related by kind (according to AiG's own displays at the Ark Encounter) or is the same as modern animals. Take "beavers" and "beaver-like" animals. Again, looking at AiG's own display at the Ark Encounter; "beaver-like" is on the "extinct" listing of kinds. And "beaver" is on the "extant" listing of kinds. With no connection between the two.

if you deny the existance of god,you can live life your way

It shows how religion can twist peoples minds when you consider the fact that grown adults can actually believe these riduculous childrens stories. Grow up.

Funny but there are no curent day mamels or current day birds found in the same layer as dinosaurs.. also there are some dinosaur fossils found complete like thr velociraptor and the protosceratops found both tangled in a fight.. also the archyoprex and the dozens of dinosaur eggs contain complete fossils.. so there goes that argument.

The answeres are first that there were not many kinds. its a error of organized creationism and historic thought by christians to imagine the host of creatures we have to say were on the arl. they were. but not in theb present bodyplans. That means squeeze all the creatures into smaller numbers of kinds. for example there surely was only one pair of snake or seven pairs etc. there was no giragges or elephants or bears. They were accounted for in kinds more inclusive. Simple. Thats why the critters found in fossils below the k-t line, the flood year line for most creationists, is soooo unlike those critters found in fossil or living above the line. a option.

What is the problem with baby dinosaurs in the Ark? They wouldn't take much room, and wouldn't eat much.

Nowhere. There was no flood. It was disproven in the 19th century and 100 times over since then.

No fossils but they have found footprints side by side and the explanation given before vandalized was ridiculous dino prints sunk then reemerges tens of thousands of yrs later and humans walked buy them before being buried again